Class I |
Simple holding instrument capable of accepting a simple static registration |
Slab articulator |
Class II |
Instrument that permits horizontal as well as vertical motion but do not orient the motion of TMJ via face bow transfer |
|
IIA |
Eccentric motion permitted is based on average or arbitary values |
Mean vale articulator |
IIB |
Limited eccentric motion is possible based on theories of arbitary motion |
Monsons articulator |
IIC |
Limited eccentric motion is possible based on engraving records obtained from the patient |
House articulator |
Class III |
Permit horizontal , vertical positions and also accept face bow transfer and protrusive |
|
IIIA |
Accept a static protrusive registration and they use equivalents for other types of motion |
Hanau mate |
IIIB |
They accept static lateral registration also in addition to protrusive as well as face bow transfer. They use equivalents for other types of motion |
Ney |
Class IV |
They accept 3D dynamic registrations and utilize a face bow transfer |
|
IVA |
The condylar path registerd cannot be modified |
TMJ articulator |
IVB |
They allow customization of the condylar path |
Stuart instrument |
6 Hanaus's quint : Rudolph L. Hanu proposed nine factors that govern the articulation of artificial teeth . They are
These 9 factors are called the laws of balanced articulation. Hanau later condensed these nine factors and formulated five■ Horizontal condylar inclination
■ protrusive incisal guidance
■ Relative cusp height
■ compensating curve
■ plane of orientation
■ Buccolingual inclination of tooth axis
■ Sagittal condylar pathway
■ Sagittal incisal guidance
■ Tooth alignment
WhatsApp us